Daikyukim.kr: Daikyukim.kr moved page Test/Bibliography to EoK Test/Bibliography

2025-11-19T04:57:35Z

Daikyukim.kr moved page Test/Bibliography to EoK Test/Bibliography

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:57, 19 November 2025
(No difference)

Wikiuser: Imported from text file

2025-08-27T01:32:12Z

Imported from text file

New page

== Bibliography ==
Most European languages have a technical term that has its origin in the term
bibliographia. In English usage (c. 1814), ‘bibliography’ has historically been used to
designate a description of books. In today’s usage, however, it holds the meaning of a list
of books or other literature on or relating to a particular subject, and the theory behind
these compilations. Moreover, ‘bibliography’ can often vary to a degree, and may include
such aspects as the investigation of particulars of the authorship, publication, and printing
of a certain work. In the nineteenth c., the term ‘bibliography’ also included the science of
the book and the organisation of libraries. This is commonly referred to as ‘historical
bibliography’ in contemporary English language scholarship.

In the Korean language, the term sŏjihak is used in the same manner as the English
‘bibliography’. Sŏjihak literally means the ‘study of the records of books,’ which reveals
that the aims of this academic discipline in Korea are essentially the same as they are in
Western scholarship.

=== Original Text Bibliographies ===
The start of bibliography in Korean history can be found during the Three Kingdoms. In
this era, books of many kinds were brought from China, and in the process of
propagation, these were re-copied. As an integral part of the copying process, any
mistaken or confused characters were adjusted, along with the correction of poorly written
or erroneous sentences in the original text. In particular, any inconsistencies in the
original would be rectified, and in the case of Buddhist texts, discrepancies would be
compared with translations of the original in classical Chinese and even with other
versions, in order to ascertain the correct word or phrase. With the advent of printing
technologies, the need to ensure accuracy of the text became all the more important. An
examination of the Dharani Sutra (mugu chŏnggwangdae tarani kyŏng), which is dated
751 C.E.(denoting it as the world’s oldest known printed material), reveals the care in
which it was edited. Likewise, the Pohyŏbin tarani kyŏng, which was printed in 1007 at
Ch’ŏngji Temple, is significant in that it corrected many of the errors present in the
version transmitted from China.

The importance of the individuals who undertook the editing and engraving of
woodblocks for the printing of Buddhist scriptures can be seen in both the establishment
of the Kyojang Togam (Directorate for Buddhist Scriptures) and also at the end of the
works, where the name of the monk who had ensured the accuracy of the work is clearly
indicated. Therefore, an examination of an ancient Buddhist text will show the name of
the monk, or monks, charged with the proof- reading and editing of the work. The
meticulous care given to the correction of mistaken characters, sentences and
inconsistencies in the various Buddhist texts is seen in the completion of the P’alman
taejanggyŏng (Tripitaka Koreana), which was compiled both from earlier efforts and
Chinese sources. There is a thirty-volume record of the many corrections, entitled
Koryŏguk shinjo taejang kyojŏng pyŏllok (Record of the Corrections of the New Carving
of the Tripitaka of Koyrŏ), written by the monk Sugi. The thoroughness of Sugi is attested
in that the P’alman taejanggyŏng carved during Koryŏ is accepted as the most accurate
in the world, being almost flawless insofar as omitted characters and erroneous sentences
are concerned.

During Chosŏn, procedures for editing and ensuring the accuracy of works before printing
were taken to an even higher level than those practised in Koryŏ. Works edited at
government offices were assigned to government officials, who completed the
corrections. When a book was printed, regardless of whether it was with metal type or
woodblocks, the errors in the original were corrected and then noted with a ‘corrected’
(kyojang) stamp. In the case of a book which was to be printed with metal type, a special
official at the Office of Compilation and Corrections (Kamgyugwan) was given the task
of correcting the work. The ultra-serious attitude in the compilation of books is seen in the
legal code of the Taejŏn husongnok (National Code supplement), which prescribed harsh
sanctions for errors in a printed work. The government official responsible at the Office of
Compilation and Corrections, or any other governmental institution that had participated
in the editorial and revision process would be punished by flogging, removal from his
post, or by a reduction of pay. Quite clearly, therefore, accuracy in the compilation of
books was very important. Consequently, the works printed with metal type during
Chosŏn are distinguished by their accuracy and their fine quality.

After Korea’s liberation from the Japanese in 1945, the main thrust of activity in
bibliography was expressed in Ch’oe Namsŏn’s revision of the Samguk yusa
(Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms) and in the Society for the Advancement of
National Culture (Minjok Munhwa Ch’ujin Hoe), which also published revisions of the
Samguk yusa and the Samguk sagi (History of the Three Kingdoms). Also, at this time,
Cho Pyŏngsun compiled Chŭngsu poju samguk sagi (Supplemented and Enlarged
History of the Three Kingdoms). A thesis published on the subject of bibliography is
‘Saero palgyŏndoen kop’an pon samguk sagi’ (Newly Discovered Ancient Editions of the
History of the Three Kingdoms) by Ch’ŏn Hyebong. There are other other works by
Korean scholars which seek to analyse the origins and contents of Korea’s ancient works.

=== Bibliography Systems ===
The importance of bibliographical techniques in the compilation of books in Korea was
traditionally greater than in China, and this was due to the Korean desire to create
accurate woodblock-print works. Today, the oldest extant bibliographical examinations
are the three volumes of Shinp’yŏn chejong kyojang ch’ongnok (New Catalogue of
Buddhist Sectarian Writings) written by Ŭich’ŏn when he was editing the P’alman
taejanggyŏng, and Taejanggyŏng mongnok (Catalogue of the Tripitaka Koreana), which
is also in three volumes. In compiling Shinp’yŏn che chon’g kyojang ch’ongnok, Ŭich’ŏn
consulted scriptures, laws, commentaries and other Buddhist writings from Koryŏ, Song
China, and Japan, et al, in order to prepare an accurate version of the Buddhist scriptures.
Ŭich’ŏn’s work is notable in that it represents the first such work in East Asia and
therefore, remains a valuable bibliographical resource to the present-day. The
Taejanggyŏng mongnok, which is now kept at Haein Temple, is highly regarded for the
study of the compilation process of the later compilation of the P’alman taejanggyŏng in
that it deleted the supplements contained by the Shinp’yŏn chejong kyojang ch’ongnok
and replaced the original omissions. And so, it provides an accurate record of the editorial
process in the compilation of the P’alman taejanggyŏng.

During Chosŏn, with the intent to republish documents printed before the 1592 Japanese
Invasion, materials were gathered from every corner of Korea for the Kosa ch’waryo.
Serving a similar purpose for works printed after the invasion is Koch’aekp’an sojae ko
(Treatise on the Whereabouts of Ancient Printing Blocks); which is a catalogue of works
up until the mid-nineteenth c. Falling between these two works is Sŏ Yugu’s 1796
catalogue, Nup’an ko (Treatise of Printing Plates), which is considered the principal
authority on bibliography throughout Chosŏn. Other bibliographical catalogues of Chosŏn
include, Kosŏ mongnok chipsong (Catalogue of Ancient Books) and Han’guk ch’aekp’an
mongnok ch’ongnam (Catalogue of Korean Printing Blocks).

With regard to those bibliographic works that introduce various aspects of Korean
scholarly works, Kim Hyu’s Haedong munhŏn ch’ongnok (Bibliography of Historical
Documents) catalogues various literary records dating from Shilla to mid-Chosŏn. This
work, compiled during the reign of King Injo (r. 1623-1649), contains records of some
670 documents. Other works include, Naryŏ yemun chi (Literary Records of Shilla and
Koryŏ) and Naryŏ munjŏk chi (Catalogue of Shilla and Koryŏ Documents), which both
focus on the early periods in Korea. Other bibliographies from late Chosŏn include those
written by foreigners such as the Bibliographie Coréenne (Bibliography of Korea)
compiled by M. Courant in four volumes, and Kosen satsufu (Record of Ancient Korean
Books) compiled by Maema Kyŏsaku in three volumes. A number of contemporary works
have been widely acclaimed for their discussion of bibliographical explanation, such as
the eight-volume Han’guk chŏnjŏk chonghap mongnok (Complete Catalogue of Korean
Works) published by the Society for the Preservation of National Literary Materials
(Kukhak Charyo Pojon Hoe) from 1974 to 1980, and which contains a catalogue of
private libraries.

=== Present State of Bibliographic Studies ===
Today, bibliographical studies in Korea encompass many facets of the discipline. Some of
the aspects covered include the development of commentary concerning books, their
origin and title changes. The shape and form of the book is also under scrutiny, with
bibliographers looking at the changes in binding types, in printing technology and printing
methodology, among other apects. Their research is highly- specialised, with many
bibliographers focusing on a particular era or genre of book, thereby making significant
contributions to academic research.

Vast areas of scholarship still remain to be thoroughly examined in Korean
bibliographical studies, such as an understanding of which particular qualities in Korean
literature are uniquely Korean; and which elements of the Korean lifestyle are
represented in literature and Korean consciousness, value systems and ideological beliefs.
Today, academic enquiry in the field of bibliographical study seeks to find answers to
these and other questions, through a deep understanding of Korean literature and its
developments over the past 1 500 years.

=== Bibliography ===
* Blum, Rudolf. Bibliographia: An Inquiry into its Definition and Designations. trans. Mathilde V.
Rovelstad. Chicago: American Library Association, (1969) 1980.

EoK Test/Bibliography - Revision history

Daikyukim.kr: Daikyukim.kr moved page Test/Bibliography to EoK Test/Bibliography

Wikiuser: Imported from text file